4.5 Article

Oral Sulfasalazine as a Clinical BCRP Probe Substrate: Pharmacokinetic Effects of Genetic Variation (C421A) and Pantoprazole Coadministration

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages 1046-1062

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21860

Keywords

ABC transporters; clinical pharmacokineties; drug interactions; metabolite kinetics; pharmacogenetics

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKIine
  2. UNC-GSK Pharmacokinetics Fellowship
  3. Summer Talent Identification Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the utility of oral sulfasalazine as a probe substrate for Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP; ABCG2) activity by assessing the impact of genetic variation or coadministration of an inhibitor (pantoprazole) on plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of sulfasalazine and metabolites. Thirty-six healthy male subjects prescreened for ABCG2 421CC (reference activity), CA, and AA (lower activity) genotypes (N = 12 each) received a single 500 mg oral dose of enteric coated sulfasalazine alone, with 40 mg pantoprazole, or with 40 mg famotidine (gastrointestinal pH control) in a 3-period, single fixed sequence, crossover design. No significant difference in sulfasalazine or metabolite pharmacokinetics in 421AA or CA compared to 421CC subjects was found; however, high inter-subject variability was observed. Geometric mean (95% CI) sulfasalazine plasma AUC((0-infinity)) values were 32.1 (13.2, 78.1), 16.8 (7.15, 39.6) and 62.7 (33.4, 118) mu g h/mL, and C-max were 4.01 (1.62, 9.92), 1.70 (0.66, 4.40), and 6.86 (3.61, 13.0) mu g/mL for CC, CA, and AA subjects, respectively. Pantoprazole and famotidine did not affect sulfasalazine pharmacokinetics in any genotypic cohort. These results suggest that the pharmacokinetics of oral, enteric-coated 500 mg sulfasalazine are not sufficiently sensitive to ABCG2 genetic variation or inhibitors to be useful as a clinical probe substrate of BCRP activity. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 99:1046-1062, 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available