4.5 Article

Evaluation of the reliability of nonlinear optimal solutions in pharmaceuticals using a bootstrap resampling technique in combination with Kohonen's self-organizing maps

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages 331-339

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21097

Keywords

simulations; multivariate analysis; solid dosage form; preformulation; dissolution rate; processing; physical characterization; tableting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The response surface method incorporating multivariate spline interpolation (RSM-S) is a powerful technique for the formulation optimization of pharmaceuticals. However, no satisfactory method has been developed to evaluate the reliability of the optimal solution. We integrated bootstrap (BS) resampling and Kohonen's self-organizing maps (SOM) into RSM-S using the formulation optimization of theophylline tablets as the model experiment. The hardness and the 63.2% drug release times of the tablets were measured as response variables. Based on the data set obtained, the simultaneous optimal solution was estimated using RSM-S. Leave-one-out cross-validation showed the optimal solution to be reliable. Concurrently, a large number of BS samples were generated from the original data set using BS resampling, and simultaneous optimal solutions for each BS sample (BS optimal solutions) were estimated. The distribution of the BS optimal solutions was far from a normal distribution, suggesting a mixture of global and local optimal solutions. SOM clustering was used to identify the set of global optimal solutions. SOM clustering divided the BS optimal solutions into several clusters, and the reliability of the optimal solution was evaluated from the cluster that included the optimal solution. This study offers a promising method for evaluating the reliability of nonlinear optimal solutions. (C) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available