4.6 Article

Pharmacokinetic study of cinnamaldehyde in rats by GC-MS after oral and intravenous administration

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages 150-157

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2013.10.044

Keywords

Cinnamaldehyde; Methyl cinnamate; Pharmacokinetic; GC-MS; Bioavailability

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [20872180]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A selective and sensitive method utilizing gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was developed for simultaneous determination of cinnamaldehyde, cinnamyl alcohol, and methyl cinnamate in rat plasma. Cinnamaldehyde and cinnamyl alcohol can inter-convert to one another in rats, thus simultaneous quantifying both analytes provided a reliable and accurate method of assessment. Three qualifying ions (131 m/z, 105 m/z and 92 m/z)were chosen for simultaneous quantification of cinnamaldehyde and its metabolites. In this study, the calibration curves demonstrated a good linearity and reproducibility over the range of 20-2000 ng/ml (r(2) >= 0.999) for all analytes. Furthermore, the sensitivity of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry revealed sufficient lower limit of quantitation and detection of 20 ng/ml and 5 ng/ml, respectively, in the pharmacokinetic analysis. The intra- and inter-day precision variations were less than 10.4% and 12.2%, respectively, whilst accuracy values ranged from -8.6% to 14.8%. All analytes were stable in plasma and in processed samples at room temperature for 24 h with no significant degradation after three freeze/thaw cycles. A small amount of the administered cinnamaldehyde had long half-life of 6.7 +/- 1.5 h. In this study, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was demonstrated to be a powerful tool for the pharmacokinetic studies of rats after intravenous and oral administration of cinnamaldehyde. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available