4.6 Article

Validation of a NIR quantification method for the determination of chlorogenic acid in Lonicera japonica solution in ethanol precipitation process

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.12.005

Keywords

Near-infrared spectroscopy; Accuracy profile; Lonicera japonica; Chlorogenic acid

Funding

  1. Major Special Project Foundation of China [2010ZX09502-002, 2011ZX09201-201-24]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The feasibility of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) for chlorogenic acid content analysis in ethanol precipitation process of water extract of Lonicera japonica was verified in this work. A calibration and validation set was designed for the conception and evaluation of the method adequacy. An experimental protocol was then followed, involving two different NIR instruments for data acquisition. On the basis of this protocol, the model was developed based on partial least squares regression (PLS) and the determination coefficient (R-cal(2) and R-val(2)), standard error of calibration and prediction (SEC and SEP) were 0.9962, 0.9955, 111.11 mu g/mL and 107.1 mu g/mL for Holographic Grating NIR instrument, and 0.9984, 0.9971, 53.61.1 mu g/mL and 83.3 mu g/mL for Fourier Transform NIR instrument. However, such above criteria did not clearly demonstrate the model's prediction error over each analyzed content range. Consequently, a novel approach based on accuracy profile which allowed the acquisition of the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was used to validate the robustness and accuracy of PLS model. The resulting accuracy profile showed that PLS model was able to determine chlorogenic acid content by two NIR systems, whose LLOQ was about 1550 mu g/mL. It was concluded that the two NIR systems were suitable for use as Process Analytical Technology (PAT) to understand ethanol precipitation process of water extract of Lonicera japonica. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available