4.6 Article

Facts and myths about columns packed with sub-3 μm and sub-2 μm particles

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.08.003

Keywords

Fast chromatography; Sub-2 micron particles; Kinetic efficiency; Poppe plot; Low- and high-molecular weight test compounds

Funding

  1. GEN-Lab Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing the separating efficiency enhances the separation power. The most popular solution for improving chromatographic performance is to employ columns packed with small particle diameters (i.e., sub-2 mu m particles) to induce a simultaneous improvement in efficiency, optimal velocity and mass transfer, albeit the cost of pressure. In this study a systematic evaluation of the possibilities and limitations of the separations obtained with 5 cm long narrow bore columns packed with 1.5-3.0 mu m particles is presented. Several commercially available different sub-3 mu m and sub-2 mu m packed columns were evaluated by using van Deemter, Knox and kinetic plots. Theoretical Poppe plots were constructed for each column to compare their kinetic performance. Data are presented on different polar neutral real life analytes, to show that the separation time is not obviously shorter if the particle size is reduced. Comparison of low-molecular weight compounds (one steroid and one non-steroid hormone, with molecular weights lower than 500) and a high-molecular weight one (MW similar to 1000) was conducted. Same efficiency can be achieved with columns packed with 1.9-2.1 mu m particles as with smaller particles. The column packed with 3 mu m particles had the lowest reduced plate height minimum (h = 2.2) while the column with the smallest particles (1.5 mu m) gave the highest reduced plate height minimum (h similar to 3.0). According to this study, the theoretically expected efficiency of very fine particles (diameter <2 mu m) used in practice today is compromised. Investigation of this phenomenon is presented. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available