4.6 Article

Ultra high-pressure liquid chromatographic assay of moxifloxacin in rabbit aqueous humor after topical instillation of moxifloxacin nanoparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages 110-113

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.12.008

Keywords

Moxifloxacin; Aqueous humor; Ultra high-pressure liquid chromatography; Nanoparticles; Ocular pharmacokinetics

Funding

  1. Waters India Pvt Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present report describes a rapid and sensitive ultra high-pressure liquid chromatography (UHPLC) method with UV detection to quantify moxifloxacin in rabbit aqueous humor. After deproteinisation with acetonitrile, gradient separation of moxifloxacin was achieved on a Waters Acquity BEH C18 (50 mm x 2.1 mm, 1.7 mu m) column at 50 degrees C. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water and acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. Detection of moxifloxacin was done at 296 nm. Method was found to be selective, linear (r = 0.9997), accurate (recovery, 97.30-99.99%) and precise (RSD, <= 1.72%) in the selected concentration range of 10-1000 ng/ml. Detection and quantitation limit of moxifloxacin in aqueous humor were 0.75 and 2.5 ng/ml, respectively. The aqueous humor levels of moxifloxacin after single topical instillation in three formulations, i.e. moxifloxacin solution (Moxi-SOL), anionic nanoparticles (Moxi-ANP) and cationic nanoparticles (Moxi-CNP) were investigated. A fourfold increase in the relative bioavailability was observed with the Moxi-CNP (AUC(0 -> 1) 3.14 mu g h/ml) compared with Moxi-SOL (AUC(0 -> 1) 0.79 mu g h/ml) and Moxi-ANP (AUC(0 -> 1) 0.72 mu g h/ml) formulation. The results indicate that the cationic nanoparticle increases ocular bioavailability of moxifloxacin and prolong its residence time in the eye. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available