4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

An LC method for the simultaneous screening of some common counterfeit and sub-standard antibiotics Validation and uncertainty estimation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 303-309

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2007.12.032

Keywords

counterfeit drugs; sub-standard drugs; liquid chromatography; screening method; antibiotics; uncertainty of measurement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pharmaceutical counterfeiting is a worldwide public health problem, often under-recognised, especially in developing countries where the percentage of counterfeit and sub-standard medicines is dramatically high. Antibiotics, among the most widespread drugs, have been particularly targeted by counterfeiters. World Health Organization emphasizes the need for development and distribution of screening methods explicitly targeted to counterfeit drugs. In this paper is presented a single method for the simultaneous analysis of some of the most common and counterfeited essential antibiotics: ampicillin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, doxycycline, cloxacillin, chloramphenicol. A full validation was performed in terms of linearity, precision, robustness and trueness; an assessment of uncertainty was carried out exploiting these data. A wide linearity range was investigated considering the specific nature of counterfeit and sub-standard drugs, whose content in active substance may be rather far from the declared amount. A large span in robustness parameters was considered and a complete intermediate precision assessment was conducted, envisaging the possibility of transferring the method to quality control laboratories, hopefully in developing countries. Finally, the method was successfully applied to the analysis of antibiotics purchased on the informal market in Chad, among which counterfeit and sub-standard samples were detected. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available