4.6 Article

Effects of sample preparation methods on the quantification of nucleosides in natural and cultured Cordyceps

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 231-235

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2008.05.012

Keywords

sample preparation; nucleoside; Cordyceps; high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC); diode array detection (DAD)

Funding

  1. Macao Science and Technology Development Fund [077/2005/A, 028/2006/A2]
  2. University of Macau [RG086/04-05S]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sample preparation is the first and very important step, which can greatly influence the repeatability and accuracy of the analysis. To date, several sample preparation methods with different solvents have been used for quantitative determination of nucleosides in Cordyceps, but their data are greatly various. In this study, five nucleosides, including adenosine, guanosine, inosine, uridine and cordycepin, in Cordyceps were determined using three extraction methods i.e. organic solvent pressurized liquid extraction, boiling water extraction and ambient temperature water extraction and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-diode array detection (DAD). The similar results were obtained when organic solvent pressurized liquid extraction and boiling water extraction were applied. However, the amounts of nucleosides in natural C. sinensis and cultured C. militaris extracted with ambient temperature water were greatly increased except those of adenosine in natural C. sinensis and cordycepin in cultured C. militaris. In addition, the amount of investigated nucleosides in cultured C. sinensis had no obvious variation among the three extraction methods. The results suggest that sample preparation has significant effect on the quantification of nucleosides in Cordyceps. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available