4.5 Article

Three-phase Eulerian computational fluid dynamics of air-water-oil separator under off-shore operation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages 731-747

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.08.001

Keywords

Three-phase flow; Air-water-oil separator; Separation efficiency; Three angular motions; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Pressure control

Funding

  1. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology through the Encouragement Program for The Industries of Economic Cooperation Region
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning [NRF-2016R1A2B4010423]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A three-phase transient Eulerian computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed to investigate the effect of three angular motions (rolling, yawing, and pitching) on the separation efficiency of an air-water-oil separator. The horizontal cylindrical separator included a feed inlet, a gravity separation zone with a coalescer for water and oil separation, and a mist elimination zone. The CFD model consisted of the continuity, momentum, and standard k-epsilon turbulence equations. The CFD equations were solved in a moving reference frame to take into account the angular motions. The exit pressures at the water and oil outlets were controlled using a user-defined function since the CFD model without pressure control resulted in backflow from the water outlet, which was not realistic. CFD cases, such as no motion, rolling, yawing, 2 degrees pitching, and 4 degrees pitching with a period of 8 s were simulated with exit pressure control. The angular motions with pressure control showed a stable cyclic behavior with a high oil separation efficiency. However, the 4 degrees pitching motion decreased the oil recovery to 93% with 77% water purity at the water outlet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available