4.6 Article

Predation on invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina) by native Australian rodents

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEST SCIENCE
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages 143-153

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10340-014-0586-2

Keywords

Alien species; Biotic resistance; Bufo marinus; Rhinella marina; Predation; Toxin resistance

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Australian Government
  3. National Council on Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACyT)
  4. Department of Parks and Wildlife (WA)
  5. University of Sydney

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The success of an invasive species can be reduced by biotic resistance from the native fauna. For example, an invader that is eaten by native predators is less likely to thrive than one that is invulnerable. The ability of invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina) to spread through Australia has been attributed to the toad's potent defensive chemicals that can be fatal if ingested by native snakes, lizards, marsupials and crocodiles. However, several taxa of native insects and birds are resistant to cane toad toxins. If native rodents are also capable of eating toads (as suggested by anecdotal reports), these large, abundant and voracious predators might reduce toad numbers. Our field observations and laboratory trials confirm that native rodents (Melomys burtoni, Rattus colletti and Rattus tunneyi) readily kill and consume cane toads (especially small toads), and are not overtly affected by toad toxins. Captive rodents did not decrease their consumption of toads over successive trials, and ate toads even when alternative food types were available. In combination with anecdotal reports, our data suggest that rodents (both native and invasive) are predators of cane toads in Australia. Despite concerns about the decline of rodents following the invasion of toads, our data suggest that the species we studied are not threatened by toads as toxic prey, and no specific conservation actions are required to ensure their persistence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available