4.5 Article

Gingival Crevicular Fluid Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Levels Predict Treatment Outcome Among Smokers With Chronic Periodontitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages 250-260

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2013.130156

Keywords

Chronic periodontitis; cluster analysis; gingival crevicular fluid; longitudinal studies; matrix metalloproteinase 8; smoking

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland (Helsinki, Finland)
  2. Helsinki University Central Hospital [HUCH-EVO TI020Y0002, TYH 5306, TYH 6104]
  3. Finnish Dental Society Apollonia (Helsinki, Finland)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Molecular biomarkers are needed for diagnostic use in periodontal diseases. The aim of this study is to explore different gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) patterns in smokers and nonsmokers with chronic periodontitis (CP) and test the utility of baseline GCF MMP-8 levels in predicting categorically assessed treatment outcomes. Methods: The study population comprised 15 patients with CP (five non-smokers and 10 smokers). GCF sampling of five to seven periodontal sites per patient was done at baseline, post-treatment, and bimonthly during the maintenance period from 8 to 12 months. GCF MMP-8 levels were measured with an immunofluorometric assay. MMP-8 response patterns were explored by cluster analysis. The ability of baseline MMP-8 levels to predict categorical treatment outcomes was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: GCF MMP-8 response patterns could be clustered into two different site profiles among both smokers and non-smokers. Smoker site profiles 1 and 2 had significantly different clinical attachment level and gingival recession changes by the end of the maintenance period. In smoker sites, baseline MMP-8 levels significantly predicted the categorical treatment outcome. Conclusions: Baseline GCF MMP-8 levels strongly predict how MMP-8 levels behave during the maintenance period. In smoker sites, high baseline MMP-8 levels indicate weak treatment response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available