4.5 Article

In Vivo Validation of a Three-Dimensional Optical Method to Document Volumetric Soft Tissue Changes of the Interdental Papilla

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages 56-61

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.080288

Keywords

CAD-CAM; clinical research; computer software; interdental papilla

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Non-surgical and surgical periodontal treatment may cause volumetric changes in the gingival contour. Many techniques have been suggested to minimize soft tissue shrinkage; however, there is a lack of three-dimensional (3D) quantitative data comparing different treatment approaches. The aim of the present study was to clinically validate an easy-to-use chair-side procedure to document volumetric changes in the interdental papilla region. Methods: Nine volunteers participated in the study. A thin layer of a flowable composite resin material was applied on a papilla and volumetrically analyzed using the clinical chair-side computer-aided design/computer-aided machining (CAD/CAM) 3D method. To accurately measure the applied volumes, the composite resin volume was also determined using microcomputed tomography (mu-CT) and weight measurements. In addition, inter- and intraexaminer differences were evaluated in the same manner using a dental training unit (phantom head) to simulate clinical conditions. Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the results obtained by mu-CT and the weight measurements. The CAD/CAM 3D method showed a significant underestimation of the composite resin volume (P = 0,0047) compared to mu-CT, although the two methods correlated well (R-2 = 0.991). High accuracy was found when inter- and intraexaminer differences were evaluated, showing a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.99. Conclusion: CAD/CAM 3D device and software are an easy-to-use chair-side method to document changes in soft tissues. J Periodontol 2009;80:56-61.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available