4.3 Article

Cardiac troponin I concentrations as a marker of neurodevelopmental outcome at 18 months in newborns with perinatal asphyxia

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 292-295

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.1

Keywords

troponin I; perinatal asphyxia; infant newborn; prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) can be used to predict neurodevelopmental outcome at 18 months in infants with perinatal asphyxia (PA). The diagnostic value of cTnI to assess myocardial dysfunction was considered as well. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of 178 neonates admitted with PA. cTnI concentrations measured within 12 h of birth were compared with medium-term outcome assessed with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. cTnI concentrations measured within 12 h of birth were compared with clinical grade of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) and with duration of inotropic support. Two-dimensional Doppler and color Doppler findings were recorded. Fractional shortening, tricuspid and mitral regurgitation were evaluated. RESULT: A statistically significant correlation between cTnI concentration and BSID-II score was found (mental development index r - 0.69, P<0.05 and psychomotor development index r - 0.39, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant correlation between CK-MB and BSID-II score (P>0.05). Serum cTnI concentrations and duration of inotropic support were significantly greater with increasing severity of PA. cTnI was negatively correlated with fraction shortening (r - 0.64; P<0.05). The severity of tricuspid regurgitation was correlated with the cTnI concentration (r 0.61; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: In asphyxiated neonates, cTnI concentrations within 12 h of birth correlate with medium-term outcome. Early cTnI concentration correlates with severity of HIE, myocardial dysfunction and with Bayley II scores at 18 months.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available