4.3 Article

Relationship between cerebrovascular dysautoregulation and arterial blood pressure in the premature infant

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 11, Pages 722-729

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2011.17

Keywords

neonate; cerebrovascular autoregulation; intraventricular hemorrhage; cerebral oximetry index

Funding

  1. Johns Hopkins Institute
  2. Hartwell Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate cerebrovascular autoregulation as a function of arterial blood pressure (ABP) in the critically ill, premature infant. Study Design: A prospective observational pilot study was conducted in two tertiary care Neonatal Intensive-Care Units. Premature infants (n = 23, <= 30 weeks estimated gestational age with invasive ABP monitoring) were enrolled and received routine care while undergoing continuous autoregulation monitoring, using the cerebral oximetry index (COx). The COx is a moving, linear correlation coefficient between cortical reflectance oximetry and ABP. COx values were stratified as a function of ABP for individual subject recordings and for the cohort. Result: The mean duration of autoregulation monitoring was 3.2 days (median: 2.97, range: 0.61-3.99). A total of 10 of 23 (43%) developed intraventricular hemorrhage and 1 of 23 (4%) developed periventricular leukomalacia by head ultrasound. No association was found between neurologic injury and percentage of the monitoring periods with autoregulation impairment (defined as COx>0.5). Lower ABP was associated with dysautoregulation (higher COx values, P<0.01). The percentage of time with impaired autoregulation was greater with lower ABP (P=0.013, Spearman r=0.51). Conclusion: All infants studied had periods with intact and periods with impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation, measured with the COx. Low ABP was associated with impaired autoregulation. Journal of Perinatology (2011) 31, 722-729; doi:10.1038/jp.2011.17; published online 3 March 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available