4.3 Article

Prohepcidin concentrations and erythroid progenitors in cord blood of appropriate versus small for gestational age neonates

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 396-398

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2009.179

Keywords

hepcidin; prohepcidin; erythropoietin; erythroid progenitors; small for gestational age

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Prohepcidin (Pro-Hep), synthesized in the liver, is the prohormone of hepcidin (Hep), which reduces iron absorption in the gut; its synthesis is enhanced by inflammation and is reduced during hypoxia. We aimed to study the hypothesis that infants born small for gestational age (SGA) have reduced cord blood concentrations of Pro-Hep. Study Design: Cord blood was collected from 20 SGA (term and near term >35 week gestation) infants and 20 appropriate for gestational age (AGA) controls. We excluded infants exposed to maternal chronic diseases, smoking, diabetes, alcohol or drug use. Both groups had a 1 min Apgar score above or equal to 7 and had normal cord blood pH (above 7.25). ELISA was used to determine serum concentrations of Pro-Hep and erythropoietin (EPO). Circulating CD71(+)/CD45(-)/SSClow cells were measured by flow cytometry as an index of erythroid progenitors. Result: There were no significant differences between groups in terms of hemoglobin concentrations, and Pro-Hep. In contrast, EPO levels and circulating CD71(+)/CD45(-)/SSClow erythroid progenitors were significantly higher in the SGA group. These differences remained significant even after controlling for gestational age and gravidity. Conclusion: Contrary to EPO upregulation during intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and higher concentrations of circulating erythroid progenitors, Pro-Hep concentration is not affected by IUGR. Journal of Perinatology (2010) 30, 396-398; doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.179; published online 5 November 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available