4.3 Review

Anxious and depressive components of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in maternal postpartum psychological problems

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 343-348

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0258

Keywords

Anxiety symptoms; depression symptoms; Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; factor analysis; predictive validity

Funding

  1. Piccole Stelle Onlus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a widely used instrument for screening for postpartum depression, but it might also detect anxiety symptoms. Objective: To investigate the factor structure of the EPDS administered immediately after delivery and to understand which factors predict a high EPDS score 3 months later. Methods: A cohort of 594 Italian mothers delivering a healthy baby at Versilia Hospital completed the EPDS at two points in time: 2 days after delivery (T-0) and 3 months later (T-1) by telephone interview. Results: EPDS scores were higher at T 0 than at T-1. Overall, 15.7 % of women at 2 days postpartum and 7.6 % at 3 months later reported a score > 9. The factor analysis of EPDS at T 0 indicated a three-factor structure: depression (items 7-10), anxiety (items 3-6) and anhedonia (items 1-2). Anxious symptoms were quantitatively more important than depressive ones (mean 3.9 vs. 1.2) but tended to spontaneously ameliorate at T-1, whereas total EPDS score at T-1 was better predicted by depressive symptoms at T-0 (discriminative ability 0.75 vs. 0.68). Conclusions: This study suggests that EPDS subscales immediately after delivery help understand the spectrum of maternal postpartum psychological problems. Anxious symptoms immediately after delivery are frequent but transient, linked probably to maternity blues or atypical depression, whereas the presence of depressive symptomatology at T-0 suggests higher risk of later depressive disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available