4.6 Article

Delays in Diagnosis of Congenital Hearing Loss in Rural Children

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 164, Issue 2, Pages 393-397

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.09.047

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources [KL2 RR033171, KL2TR000116]
  2. National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [1U24-DC012079-01]
  3. National Institutes of Health Loan Repayment Program
  4. University of Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To examine the incidence of pediatric congenital hearing loss and the timing of diagnosis in a rural region of hearing healthcare disparity. Study design Data from the Kentucky newborn hearing-screening program was accessed to determine the incidence of congenital hearing loss in Kentucky, both in the extremely rural region of Appalachia and non-Appalachian region of Kentucky. We also performed a retrospective review of records of children with congenital hearing loss at our institution to determine the timing of diagnostic testing. Results In Kentucky, during 2009-2011, there were 6970 newborns who failed hearing screening; the incidence of newborn hearing loss was 1.71 per 1000 births (1.28/1000 in Appalachia and 1.87/1000 in non-Appalachia); 23.8% of Appalachian newborns compared with 17.3% of non-Appalachian children failed to obtain follow-up diagnostic testing. Children from Appalachia were significantly delayed in obtaining a final diagnosis of hearing loss compared with children from non-Appalachian regions (P = .04). Conclusion Congenital hearing loss in children from rural regions with hearing healthcare disparities is a common problem, and these children are at risk for a delay in the timing of diagnosis, which has the potential to limit language and social development. It is important to further assess the causative factors and develop interventions that can address this hearing healthcare disparity issue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available