4.6 Article

Oral Propranolol for Retinopathy of Prematurity: Risks, Safety Concerns, and Perspectives

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 163, Issue 6, Pages 1570-U86

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.07.049

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To evaluate safety and efficacy of oral propranolol administration in preterm newborns affected by an early phase of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Study design Fifty-two preterm newborns with Stage 2 ROP were randomized to receive oral propranolol (0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg/6 hours) added to standard treatment or standard treatment alone. To evaluate safety of the treatment, hemodynamic and respiratory variables were continuously monitored, and blood samples were collected weekly to check for renal, liver, and metabolic balance. To evaluate efficacy of the treatment, the progression of the disease (number of laser treatments, number of bevacizumab treatments, and incidence of retinal detachment) was evaluated by serial ophthalmologic examinations, and plasma soluble E-selectin levels were measured weekly. Results Newborns treated with propranolol showed less progression to Stage 3 (risk ratio 0.52; 95% CI 0.47-0.58, relative reduction of risk 48%) or Stage 3 plus (relative risk 0.42 95% CI 0.31-0.58, relative reduction of risk 58%). The infants required fewer laser treatments and less need for rescue treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (relative risk 0.48; 95% CI 0.29-0.79, relative reduction of risk 52 %), a 100% relative reduction of risk for progression to Stage 4. They also had significantly lower plasma soluble E-selectin levels. However, 5 of the 26 newborns treated with propranolol had serious adverse effects (hypotension, bradycardia), in conjunction with episodes of sepsis, anesthesia induction, or tracheal stimulation. Conclusion This pilot study suggests that the administration of oral propranolol is effective in counteracting the progression of ROP but that safety is a concern.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available