4.6 Article

Calcineurin Inhibitor Treatment of Intravenous Immunoglobulin-Resistant Kawasaki Disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 161, Issue 3, Pages 506-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.02.048

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL69413, HL103536]
  2. Food and Drug Administration Orphan Drug Grant Program
  3. Clinical and Translational Research Institute (University of California at San Diego, NIH CTSA) [5UL1 RR031980]
  4. Hartwell Foundation
  5. Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To describe the clinical course and outcome of 10 patients with Kawasaki disease (KD) treated with a calcineurin inhibitor after failing to respond to multiple therapies. Study design Demographic and clinical data were prospectively collected using standardized case report forms. T-cell phenotypes were determined by flow cytometry, and KD risk alleles in ITPKC (rs28493229), CASP3 (rs72689236), and FCGR2A (rs1801274) were genotyped. Results Intravenous followed by oral therapy with cyclosporine (CSA) or oral tacrolimus was well tolerated and resulted in defervescence and resolution of inflammation in all 10 patients. There were no serious adverse events, and a standardized treatment protocol was developed based on our experiences with this patient population. Analysis of T-cell phenotype by flow cytometry in 2 subjects showed a decrease in circulating activated CD8(+) and CD4(+) T effector memory cells after treatment with CSA. However, suppression of regulatory T-cells was not seen, suggesting targeting of specific, proinflammatory T-cell compartments by CSA. Conclusion Treatment of refractory KD with a calcineurin inhibitor appears to be a safe and effective approach that achieves rapid control of inflammation associated with clinical improvement. (J Pediatr 2012;161:506-12).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available