4.6 Article

Maternal Smoking during Pregnancy and Regional Brain Volumes in Preterm Infants

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 156, Issue 2, Pages 185-U40

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.07.061

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Emil Aaltonen's Foundation
  2. Finnish Academy of Science
  3. South-West Finnish Fund of Neonatal Research
  4. Parivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation
  5. Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies
  6. Turku University Hospital Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To evaluate the association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and both brain volumes and head circumference in very-low-birth-weight/very-low-gestational-age infants. Study design The PIPARI Study is a prospective follow-up study of infants with a birth weight <= 1500 g or a gestational age <32 weeks born in 2001 to 2006 (n = 232) at Turku University Hospital. The brain was imaged by serial brain ultrasound examinations until discharge and magnetic resonance imaging at term age. The head circumference was measured at birth, term, and 2 years corrected age. These measures were correlated to maternal smoking during pregnancy as reported by the mothers. Results The prevalence of maternal smoking was 18%. The frontal lobe (P = .01) and the cerebellar (P = .03) volumes were significantly smaller in the exposed than in the unexposed infants. The volumes of the other parts of the brain did not differ. There was no association between prenatal smoking exposure and head growth or structural brain disease. Conclusions Prenatal smoking exposure was associated with significantly smaller frontal lobe and cerebellar volumes in the brains of preterm infants. This is consistent with reports showing an association between prenatal smoking exposure and impairments in frontal lobe and cerebellar functions such as emotion, impulse control, and attention. (J Pediatr 2010;156:185-90).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available