4.6 Article

Population Trends Toward Increasing Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Canadian Adolescents

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 157, Issue 5, Pages 837-843

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.05.014

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research
  2. CIBC World Markets Children's Miracle Foundation Chair in Child Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To determine prevalence and cross-sectional trends over time for cardiovascular risk factors in Canadian adolescents. Study design Cross-sectional trends in cardiovascular risk and lifestyle factors were gathered annually in 14- to 15-year-old students in the Niagara region, Ontario, Canada. Results A total of 20 719 adolescents were screened between 2002 and 2008. The proportion of obese adolescents (> 95th percentile for body mass index [BMI]) increased significantly, by +0.34%/year (P = .002). The proportions of adolescents with borderline high cholesterol (4.4-5.1 mmol/L) (+0.57%/year; P < .001) and with high cholesterol (>= 5.2 mmol/L) (+0.43%/year; P < .001) both increased significantly over time. The proportion of adolescents with prehypertension decreased by -0.23%/year (P = .02), whereas the proportion of those with stage I hypertension (5%-6%) or stage II hypertension (2%-4%) remained constant. The proportion of adolescents classified as being at high cardiovascular risk increased by +0.67%/year (P < .001). Family history, low levels of physical activity, sedentary behaviors, poor nutrition, and lower socioeconomic status were all independently and negatively associated with all aspects of cardiovascular risk. Conclusions A significant proportion of 14- to 15-year-old Canadian adolescents have at least one cardiovascular risk factor, and the cross-sectional trends worsened during the period 2002-2008. (J Pediatr 2010;157:837-43).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available