4.4 Article

Intraperitoneal microdialysis in the postoperative surveillance after surgery for necrotizing enterocolitis: a preliminary report

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 352-356

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.11.015

Keywords

Necrotizing enterocolitis; Intraperitoneal microdialysis; Lactate/pyruvate ratio

Funding

  1. Danish Council for Independent Research/Medical Sciences [09-06-3498]
  2. Hojmosegard Legatet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Purpose: The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate the safety and clinical application of intraperitoneal microdialysis (MD) in preterm infants operated on for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Methods: Fourteen infants underwent MD. Two were excluded from analysis: 1 because of catheter malfunction and 1 because of fatal outcome immediately after surgery. The median MD time was 122 hours. Samples were collected every 4 hours, and the concentration of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, and glycerol was measured. Results: Three infants were reoperated on: 2 because of recurrent NEC and 1 because of ileal stenosis. In the 2 cases with recurrent NEC, changes in MD variables were found. Another had a prolonged postoperative period owing to diffuse fecal peritonitis. The values of MD normalized along with the return of bowel function. In 8 infants, the postoperative course was uncomplicated. The results of peritoneal MD in patients with complications were significantly different from those with an uncomplicated course (lactate/pyruvate ratio and glucose concentration). Conclusion: Peritoneal MD is a safe procedure and an applicable method in surveillance of the metabolic and inflammatory changes in the peritoneal cavity after surgery for NEC. Larger series are needed to evaluate the clinical significance and use of this method. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available