Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of Lenke and King classifications for idiopathic scoliosis and the influence of level of professional training
Thomas Niemeyer et al.
SPINE (2006)
Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence:: standard values and prediction of lordosis
C Boulay et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2006)
Loss of coronal correction following instrumentation removal in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
BK Potter et al.
SPINE (2006)
Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects
R Vialle et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2005)
Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
FD Faro et al.
SPINE (2004)
Factors involved in the decision to perform a selective versus nonselective fusion of Lenke 1B and 1C (King-Moe II) curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
PO Newton et al.
SPINE (2003)
Treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis - An assessment of the Lenke classification
RM Puno et al.
SPINE (2003)
Standing lateral radiographic positioning does not represent customary standing balance
MC Marks et al.
SPINE (2003)
Correlation of radiographic, clinical, and patient assessment of shoulder balance following fusion versus nonfusion of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
TR Kuklo et al.
SPINE (2002)
Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Lenke's new scoliosis classification system
M Ogon et al.
SPINE (2002)
Indications of proximal thoracic curve fusion in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis - Recognition and treatment of double thoracic curve pattern in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with segmental instrumentation
SI Suk et al.
SPINE (2000)
Longitudinal changes in trunkal balance after selective fusion of King II curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
R Frez et al.
SPINE (2000)
Share Paper
