4.3 Article

Biological Therapy in a Pediatric Crohn Disease Population at a Referral Center

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000276

Keywords

Crohn disease; infliximab; long-term outcome; adalimumab; pediatrics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The antitumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) antibodies infliximab and adalimumab are effective in inducing and maintaining remission in pediatric patients with Crohn disease (CD). The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of biological therapy in pediatric patients with CD followed at a referral center. Methods: This work is a retrospective observational study enrolling patients with CD treated with infliximab or adalimumab beyond the induction protocol. The patients' data were collected from the unit's IBD database (maximum follow-up evaluation after 36 months of treatment). The efficacy was evaluated by the Pediatric Crohn Disease Activity Index score and by analysis of the cumulative probability of continuing therapy; the safety was assessed in terms of adverse events. Results: We enrolled 78 patients; the mean therapy duration was 27.2 +/- 16.7 months, and the mean age at enrollment was 15 +/- 3.1 years. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a cumulative probability of continuing therapy of 81%, 54%, and 33% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, from the introduction of therapy. No association between the patients' baseline characteristics and the long-term outcome was found. The evaluation of the concomitant therapy with immunomodulators and anti-TNF alpha therapy versus anti-TNF alpha alone did not show a different outcome. No serious adverse events were recorded. Conclusions: The study indicates that biological therapy is effective and safe in pediatric patients with CD in a longer follow-up period. The response to treatment was not influenced by the patients' baseline characteristics or by the immunomodulator association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available