4.7 Article

MiR-182 overexpression in tumourigenesis of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 228, Issue 2, Pages 204-215

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/path.4000

Keywords

BRCA1; HMGA2; miR-182; MTSS1; ovarian serous carcinoma

Funding

  1. Marsh Rivkin Center for Ovarian Cancer Research
  2. Dixon Translation Research Fund
  3. The National Natural Science Foundation of China [81171897]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molecular pathogenesis of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HG-SOC) is poorly understood. Recent recognition of HG-SOC precursor lesions, defined as serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) in fimbria, provides a new venue for the study of early genetic changes in HG-SOC. Using microRNA profiling analysis, we found that miR-182 expression was significantly higher in STIC than in matched normal Fallopian tube. Further study revealed that miR-182 was significantly overexpressed in most HG-SOC cases. To test whether miR-182 plays a major role in early tumourigenesis of HG-SOC, we overexpressed miR-182 in immortalized ovarian surface, Fallopian tube secretory cells and malignant ovarian cell lines, and found that miR-182 overexpression resulted in increased tumour transformation in vitro, and enhanced tumour invasiveness in vitro and metastasis in vivo. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that the oncogenic properties of miR-182 in ovarian cancer were mediated in part by its impaired repair of DNA double-strand breaks and negative regulation of breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and metastasis suppressor 1 (MTSS1) expression as well as its positive regulation of the oncogene high-mobility group AT-hook 2 (HMGA2). Our findings suggest that miR-182 dysregulation confers powerful oncogenic potential in the tumourigenesis of HG-SOC. Copyright (c) 2012 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available