Journal
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 412-419Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1177/0148607108319803
Keywords
erythromycin; metoclopramide; gastric motility; enteral nutrition; gastric residual; intensive care; critical illness
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate erythromycin vs metoclopramide for facilitating gastric emptying and tolerance to intragastric enteral nutrition (EN). Methods: Twenty critically ill patients with a gastric residual >150 mL while receiving EN were randomized to receive 4 intravenous doses of erythromycin 250 mg or metoclopramide 10 mg, each administered every 6 hours. Acetaminophen 975 mg was administered enterally at baseline and after the fourth dose. Acetaminophen peak plasma concentration (Cmax), concentration at 60 minutes (C-60), time to Cmax(Tmax), and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 60 minutes (AUC(0-60)) were determined. Residual volumes and feeding rates were recorded. Results: Compared with baseline, erythromycin increased Cmax (9.5 +/- 6.1 mg/L to 17.7 +/- 11.9 mg/L, P < .01 C-60 (5.4 +/- 3.5 mg/L to 12.9 +/- 7.6 mg/L, P < .01), and AUC(0-60) (3.5 +/- 3.0 mg(.)h/L to 12.5 +/- 8.7 mg(.)h/L, P < .01), while metoclopramide increased only AUC(0-60) (4.4 +/- 2.8 mg(.)h/L to 9.5 +/- 3.8 mg(.)hr/L, P < .05). Neither agent significantly reduced Tmax. Both erythromycin and metoclopramide reduced residual volumes (122 +/- 48 mL to 36 +/- 48 mL, P < .01, and 103 +/- 88 mL to 21 +/- 23 mL, P < .05, respectively) and allowed increased feeding rates (17 +/- 23 mL/h to 45 +/- 21 mL/h, P < .05, and 14 +/- 17 mL/h to 44 +/- 22 mL/h, P < .05, respectively). Conclusions: Both agents facilitate tolerance to intragastric EN, but erythromycin may be more effective than metoclopramide for enhancing gastric motility.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available