4.0 Article

DIFFERENT SCALES OF SPATIAL SEGREGATION OF TWO SPECIES OF FEATHER MITES ON THE WINGS OF A PASSERINE BIRD

Journal

JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages 237-244

Publisher

ALLEN PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1645/GE-2585.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The condition-specific competition hypothesis proposes that coexistence of 2 species is possible when spatial or temporal variations in environmental conditions exist and each species responds differently to those conditions. The distribution of different species of feather mites on their hosts is known to be affected by intrinsic host factors such as structure of feathers and friction among feathers during flight, but there is also evidence that external factors such as humidity and temperature can affect mite distribution. Some feather mites have the capacity to move through the plumage rather rapidly, and within-host variation in intensity of sunlight could be one of the cues involved in these active displacements. We analyzed both the within-and between-feather spatial distribution of 2 mite species, Trouessartia bifurcata and Dolichodectes edwardsi, that coexist in flight feathers of the moustached warbler Acrocephalus melanopogon. A complex spatial segregation between the 2 species was observed at 3 spatial levels, i.e., feather surfaces, between feathers, and within feathers. Despite certain overlapping distribution among feathers, T. bifurcata dominated proximal and medial regions on dorsal faces, while D. edwardsi preferred disto-ventral feather areas. An experiment to check the behavioral response of T. bifurcata to sunlight showed that mites responded to light exposure by approaching the feather bases and even leaving its dorsal face. Spatial heterogeneity across the 3 analyzed levels, together with response to light and other particular species adaptations, may have played a role in the coexistence and segregation of feather mites competing for space and food in passerine birds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available