4.1 Article

Assessment of an Interprofessional Online Curriculum for Palliative Care Communication Training

Journal

JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 400-406

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0270

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Markey Cancer Center
  2. College of Communication and Information Studies
  3. Center for Interprofessional Healthcare, Education, Research and Practice at the University of Kentucky

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Curricular changes to palliative care communication training are needed in order to accommodate a variety of learners, especially in lieu of the projected national shortage of hospice and palliative medicine physicians and nurses. Objective: This study assessed the utility of a palliative care communication curriculum offered through an online platform and also examined health care professionals' clinical communication experiences related to palliative care topics. Design: Four of the seven modules of the COMFORT communication curriculum were made available online, and participant assessments and knowledge skills were measured. Setting: Modules were completed and assessed by 177 participants, including 105 nurses, 25 physicians, and a category of other' disciplines totaling 47. Measurements: Premodule surveys consisted of closed-ended items developed by the interdisciplinary research team. Postcurriculum evaluation and knowledge quizzes were used to assess program effectiveness. Results: Among all participants, end-of-life care and recurrence of disease were considered the most challenging communication contexts and discussion about treatment options the least challenging. Mean responses to postcurriculum evaluation for all modules across nurse and physician participants was greater than 4 on a scale of 1 to 5. Conclusions: This study identifies the COMFORT communication curriculum as an effective online curricular tool to teach multiple disciplines specific palliative care communication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available