4.5 Article

Direct Observation of Prognosis Communication in Palliative Care: A Descriptive Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 202-212

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.02.004

Keywords

Prognostication; prognosis; communication; palliative care; end of life; decision making

Funding

  1. National Palliative Care Research Center
  2. Greenwall Foundation
  3. Health Services Research Career Development Award from the Department of Veterans Affairs [RCD 07-006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Palliative care (PC) consultations result in improved patient understanding of prognosis and better quality of life, yet the content and processes of prognosis communication during PC consultations remain unknown. Objectives. To describe prognosis communication during PC consultation with seriously ill hospitalized patients. Methods. We audio recorded 71 sequential inpatient PC consultations (initial visit) with seriously ill patients and their families who were referred for goals of care'' clarification or help with end-of-life decision making.'' Conversations were coded using reliable methods and we then linked conversation codes to clinical record and clinician interview data. Results. Ninety-three percent of consultations contained prognosis communication. Participants communicated prognoses regarding quality of life more frequently than survival; focused prognosis estimates on the unique patient more frequently than on a general population; and framed prognosis using pessimistic cues more frequently than optimistic ones. Prognoses were more commonly spoken by PC clinicians than by patients/families. The following two factors demonstrated an association with the rate of prognostic communication and with the pessimistic framing of that information: whether the patient, family, or both participated in the conversation, and shorter expected survival (as estimated by the attending physician). Conclusion. Prognoses are routinely communicated in PC consultations with hospitalized patients and their families. The rate and characteristics of prognosis communication differ based on the length of time the patient is expected to live. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013;45:202-212. (C) 2013 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available