4.4 Article

Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) for Quality Improvement of Pain Management in Hospitalized Adults Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages 1172-1186

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.012

Keywords

Psychometrics; quality improvement; outcomes; patient survey; adult

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quality improvement (QI) is a compilation of methods adapted from psychology stabs tics and operations research to identify factors that contribute to poor treatment outcomes and to design solutions for improvement Valid and reliable measurement is essential to QI using rigorously developed and tested instruments The purpose of this article is to describe the evolution of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS POQ) for QI purposes and present a revised version (R) including instrument psychometrics An interdisciplinary task force of the APS used a step wise empiric approach to revise test and examine psychometric properties of the society s original POQ The APS POQ R is designed for use in adult hospital pain management QI activities and measures 6 aspects of quality including (1) pain severity and relief (2) impact of pain on activity sleep and negative emotions (3) side effects of treatment (4) helpfulness of information about pain treatment (5) ability to participate in pain treatment decisions and (6) use of nonpharmacological strategies Adult medical surgical inpatients (n = 299) from 2 hospitals in different parts of the United States participated in this study Results provide support for the internal consistency of the instrument subscales construct validity and clinical feasibility Perspective This article presents the initial psychometric properties of the APS POQ R for quality improvement purposes of hospitalized adult patients Validation in additional groups of patients will be needed to demonstrate its generalizability (C) 2010 by the American Pain Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available