4.5 Article

Hip abduction can prevent posterior edge loading of hip replacements

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages 1172-1179

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22364

Keywords

avoid edge loading; muscles; hip; ceramic-on-ceramic; metal-on-metal

Categories

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  2. Institution of Mechanical Engineers
  3. EPSRC [EP/K027549/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K027549/1, 1124908] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Edge loading causes clinical problems for hard-on-hard hip replacements, and edge loading wear scars are present on the majority of retrieved components. We asked the question: are the lines of action of hip joint muscles such that edge loading can occur in a well-designed, well-positioned acetabular cup? A musculoskeletal model, based on cadaveric lower limb geometry, was used to calculate for each muscle, in every position within the complete range of motion, whether its contraction would safely pull the femoral head into the cup or contribute to edge loading. The results show that all the muscles that insert into the distal femur, patella, or tibia could cause edge loading of a well-positioned cup when the hip is in deep flexion. Patients frequently use distally inserting muscles for movements requiring deep hip flexion, such as sit-to-stand. Importantly, the results, which are supported by in vivo data and clinical findings, also show that risk of edge loading is dramatically reduced by combining deep hip flexion with hip abduction. Patients, including those with sub-optimally positioned cups, may be able to reduce the prevalence of edge loading by rising from chairs or stooping with the hip abducted. (c) 2013 Orthopaedic Research Society Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 31:1172-1179, 2013

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available