4.5 Article

Comparison of the osteogenic capacity of minipig and human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 1019-1025

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22049

Keywords

mesenchymal stem cell; differentiation; osteogenesis; dexamethasone; minipig; human

Categories

Funding

  1. EU [NMP3-CT-2007-026279]
  2. Finska Lakaresallskapet (Einar och Karin Stroems stiftelse)
  3. Paulo Foundation
  4. Finnish Cultural Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Minipigs are a recommended large animal model for preclinical testing of human orthopedic implants. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the key repair cells in bone healing and implant osseointegration, but the osteogenic capacity of minipig MSCs is incompletely known. The aim of this study was to isolate and characterize minipig bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) MSCs in comparison to human BM-MSCs. BM sample was aspirated from posterior iliac crest of five male Gottingen minipigs (age 15 +/- 1 months). PB sample was drawn for isolation of circulating MSCs. MSCs were selected by plastic-adherence as originally described by Friedenstein. Cell morphology, colony formation, proliferation, surface marker expression, and differentiation were examined. Human BM-MSCs were isolated and cultured from adult fracture patients (n?=?13, age 1960 years) using identical techniques. MSCs were found in all minipig BM samples, but no circulating MSCs could be detected. Minipig BM-MSCs had similar morphology, proliferation, and colony formation capacities as human BM-MSCs. Unexpectedly, minipig BM-MSCs had a significantly lower ability than human BM-MSCs to form differentiated and functional osteoblasts. This observation emphasizes the need for species-specific optimization of MSC culture protocol before direct systematic comparison of MSCs between human and various preclinical large animal models can be made. (C) 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 30:10191025, 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available