4.5 Article

Porous Tantalum Stimulates the Proliferation and Osteogenesis of Osteoblasts from Elderly Female Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 609-616

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21251

Keywords

age/aging; biocompatibility; osteoblast; tantalum; titanium

Categories

Funding

  1. Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Porous tantalum (Ta) implants have been successful in various orthopedic procedures for patients with compromised bone-forming abilities. Previous studies demonstrated that human osteoblast (HOB) cultures from older female patients produced less bone on implant materials in vitro compared to HOBs from age-matched male and younger female patients. In this study, the responses of HOB s from younger (< 45) and older (> 60 years old) female patients were compared on Ta, titanium fiber mesh (TFM) and tissue culture plastic. Adhesion, proliferation, and mineralization were greater in cells from younger patients than from older patients. Cell adhesion was slightly higher on Ta than TFM or plastic. However, Ta highly stimulated cell proliferation with a 4-and 6-fold increase compared to TFM for cells from younger and older patients, respectively, and 12- and 16-fold increase in proliferation compared to cells on plastic (p <= 0.001). At 3 weeks, mineralization was significantly higher on Ta compared to TFM for HOBs from older patients (p <= 0.05). Expression levels of bone matrix markers demonstrated differences dependent on age and substrate. Scanning electron micrographs revealed HOBs covering the surfaces and entering the pores of both Ta and TFM. In conclusion, tantalum greatly stimulates cell proliferation, and improves the ability of HOBs from older patients to form bone. (C) 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:609-616, 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available