4.6 Article

Power-law optical conductivity from unparticles: Application to the cuprates

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 92, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.155128

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [DMR-1461952]
  2. Department of Physics at the University of Illinois
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology, Royal Thai Government
  4. Guggenheim Foundation
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Materials Research [1461952] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We calculate the optical conductivity by using several models for unparticle or scale-invariant matter. Within a Gaussian action for unparticles that is gauged with Wilson lines, we find that the conductivity computed from the Kubo formalism with vertex corrections yields no nontrivial deviation from the free-theory result. This result obtains because, at the Gaussian level, unparticles are just a superposition of particle fields and hence any transport property must be consistent with free theory. Beyond the Gaussian approach, we adopt the continuous-mass formulation of unparticles and calculate the Drude conductivity directly. We show that unparticles in this context can be tailored to yield an algebraic conductivity that scales as omega(-2/3) with the associated phase angle between the imaginary and real parts of arctan sigma 2/sigma 1 = 60 degrees, as is seen in the cuprates. Given the recent results [J. High Energy Phys. 4, 40 (2014); 7, 24 (2015); arXiv:1506.06769] that gravitational crystals lack a power-law optical conductivity, this constitutes the first consistent account of the omega(-2/3) conductivity and the phase angle seen in optimally doped cuprates. Our results indicate that, at each frequency in the scaling regime, excitations on all energy scales contribute. Hence, incoherence is at the heart of the power law in the optical conductivity in strongly correlated systems such as the cuprates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available