4.5 Article

Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP)-3 Gene Up-Regulation in a Rat Tail Compression Loading-Induced Disc Degeneration Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 1026-1032

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21116

Keywords

intervertabral disc; disc degeneration; animal model; matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-3; spine

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [1302-18300169]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rodent static compression loading-induced disc degeneration model still has important gaps among the radiographic, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and histological schemes and the acute and chronic expression of catabolic genes such as matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-3. Our objectives were to assess the validity of a rat tail two-disc static compression model and to elucidate a representative catabolic marker, MMP-3 gene alterations, throughout the degenerative process. Static compression at 1.3 MPa for up to 56 days produced progressive disc height loss in radiographs, lower nucleus intensity on T2-weighted MRIs, and histomorphological degeneration. Real-time RT-PCR mRNA quantification showed significant MMP-3 up-regulation in nucleus pulposus cells from 7 days and a significantly progressive increase as the loading duration lengthened, with high correlations to radiological degenerative scores. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated progressively increased positive staining for MMP-3. These results validate this animal model for disc degeneration research. Progressive mRNA and protein-distributional up-regulations indicate the significant role of MMP-3 and its feasibility as a disc degenerative marker. This model should prove useful for investigating the pathomechanism and for evaluating molecular therapies for degenerative disc disease. (C) 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 28:1026-1032, 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available