4.5 Article

Prospective, Double Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Simvastatin in Human Fracture Healing

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 281-285

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20572

Keywords

statin; fracture-healing; osteoporosis; radius

Categories

Funding

  1. NHS Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although statins are widely prescribed as cholesterol-lowering drugs, a number of studies suggest that these compounds may have anabolic effects on bone. Our aim was to assess whether simvastatin affects the rate of fracture healing in humans. A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was performed. Individuals who had sustained an undisplaced, extra-articular fracture of the distal radial metaphysis were recruited from a trauma clinic. Patients were randomized to receive simvastatin 20 mg once daily or a placebo. Regular clinical and radiological follow-up was undertaken for a 12 week period. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment of bone mineral density was conducted at 2 and 12 weeks postinjury. Biochemical markers of bone turnover were assayed during the study period. Time to fracture union was defined as the time to cortical bridging in four cortices on plain radiographs. In addition, the rate of trabecular union was assessed. Eighty patients were recruited, of which 62 completed the study (31 in each group). Study cohorts were matched for age and gender. For patients receiving simvastatin therapy, the mean time to fracture union was 71.6 days (SD 22.2 days, SEM 3.8 days). This compared to 71.3 days (SD 21.3, SEM 4.1 days) for the control cohort (p = 0.6481). There was no significant difference between bone mineral density or bone biochemical markers between groups (p > 0.05). Despite promising results from in vivo and in vitro animal studies, simvastatin at a treatment dose of 20 mg once daily does not affect the rate of fracture healing in humans. 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 27:281-285, 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available