4.7 Article

Nickel Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of Aryl C-O Based Electrophiles with Aryl Neopentylglycolboronates

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages 1018-1025

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jo2022982

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [DMR-1066116, DMS-0935165]
  2. P. Roy Vagelos Chair at Penn
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Materials Research [1066116] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [0935165] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficiency of mesylates, sulfamates, esters, carbonates, carbamates, and methyl ethers as C-O-based electrophiles attached to the 1- or 2-position of naphthalene and to activated and nonactivated phenyl substrates was compared for the first time in Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling with phenyl neopentylglycolboronates containing electron-rich and electron-deficient substituents in their para-position. These experiments were performed in the presence of four different Ni(II)- and Ni(0)-based catalysts. Ni(II)-based catalysts mediate the cross-coupling of most 2-naphthyl C-O electrophiles with both arylboronic acids and with neopentylglycolboronates when K3PO4 is used as base. The same catalysts are not efficient when CsF is used as base. However, Ni(0)-based catalysts exhibit selective efficiency, and when reactive, their efficiency is higher than that of Ni(II)-based catalysts in the presence of both K3PO4 and CsF. These results provide both reaction conditions for the cross-coupling, and for the elaboration of orthogonal cross-coupling methodologies of various C-O based electrophiles with aryl neopentylglycolboronates. With the exception of mesylates and sulfamates the efficiency of all other 2-naphthyl C-O electrophiles was lower in cross-coupling with aryl neopentylglycolboronates than with arylboronic acids

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available