4.7 Article

Computational Mechanistic Study of PMe3 and N-Heterocyclic Carbene Catalyzed Intramolecular Morita-Baylis-Hillman-Like Cycloalkylations: The Origins of the Different Reactivity

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 76, Issue 8, Pages 2733-2743

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jo200087u

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. NFSC [20973197]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been experimentally reported that PMe3 catalyzes the cycloalkylation of the pendant halogenated alpha,beta-unsaturated ketones (e.g., 1) at the C-alpha position, whereas NHC catalyzes the cycloalkylation of the pendant halogenated alpha,beta-unsaturated esters (e.g., 2) at the C-beta position. A DFT study has been performed to understand the detailed reaction mechanisms and the causes for the different ring closure positions in the two cycloalkylations promoted by the similar catalysts. Both reactions undergo three stages that include the nucleophilic addition of the catalysts (PMe3 or NHC) to the substrates (1 or 2) and subsequent ring closure via S(N)2 mechanism, the H-elimination by the bases (KOH or K3PO4), and the catalyst release giving the final products. The first stage in the NHC-catalyzed reaction involves a favorable H-transfer step leading to the umpolung Michael acceptor, which is more stable than the nucleophilic addition complex. The H-transfer turns off the possibility to close ring at C-alpha position for the reaction. In contrast, the similar H-transfer in the PMe3-catalyzed reaction is thermodynamically unfavorable. According to the electronic structure of the addition complex of PMe3 to substrate (1), we rationalize why the experimentally isolated intermediate in the PMe3-catalyzed reaction is the trans-cyclic ketophosphonium salt, rather than its cis isomer that favors electrostatic attraction. The differences and the similarities among the two reactions and the traditional MBH reaction are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available