4.7 Article

Synthesis, Structure, and Electronic and Photophysical Properties of Two- and Three-Layered [3.3]Paracyclophane-Based Donor-Acceptor Systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 75, Issue 18, Pages 6104-6114

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jo100688m

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taiwan R.O.C.
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [21106015]
  3. Venture-Business Laboratory, Kyushu University
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21106015] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The synthesis, structural, redox, and photophysical properties of the two- and three-layered donor acceptor (D-A) type [3.3]paracyclophanes ([3.3]PCPs) are described. The synthesis of the two- and three-layered [3.3]PCPs 1 and 2 containing 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (BTD) as an acceptor was achieved by the (p-ethylbenzenesulfonypmethyl isocyanide coupling method. The cyclic voltammo-grams of 1 and 2 along with those of respective dione precursors 5 and 7 clearly indicate that the presence of the -CH2COCH2- bridge interferes with the electronic interactions between the BTD and the benzene rings, suggesting the importance of the through-bond interaction in the ground state. In sharp contrast, the UV/vis spectra of 1 and 5 as well as those of 2 and 7 exhibit similar bands regardless of the presence of the -CH2COCH2- or -CH2CH2CH2- bridges, indicating that the charge-transfer (CT) interaction is mainly responsible for the through-space interaction. The two-layered PCPs, 5 and 1, show broad structureless fluorescence bands at the same position of 468 nm, while those of the three-layered PCPs, 7 and 2, appear at 501 and 496 nm, respectively, with lower quantum yields compared to those of the two-layered PCPs probably due to the stronger intramolecular CT interaction of the three-layered PCPs in the ground state.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available