4.3 Review

A functional natural dentition for all - and for life? The oral healthcare system needs revision

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
Volume 40, Issue 9, Pages 707-722

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12082

Keywords

dental caries; periodontitis; oral health; dental care; oral rehabilitation; dental health services; dental education

Funding

  1. Bagger-Sorensen Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cost of dental care adds to the costs of the already overburdened health sector. Do we - as patients and as society -receive oral health care that is both aligned with the actual disease experience and also, critically based on up-to-date scientific knowledge about the major oral diseases? In many places, the practice of dentistry reflects a response to disease patterns that once existed and is based on diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that are no longer valid. Instead, a new cadre of dental professionals is needed, one that is capable of meeting the actual health needs of our populations. This cadre should ensure that patients maintain a functioning dentition from cradle to grave based on cost-effective disease control principles. There is an urgent need to: (i) reconsider the roles of the different oral health cadres involved in the provision of oral health care; (ii) integrate oral health into general healthcare services; and (iii) restructure the training of oral health personnel. We advocate a radical reform of the oral healthcare system involving the training of two new types of professionals integrated with the general healthcare system: The oral healthcare provider - a highly skilled professional specialised in the diagnosis and control of oral diseases and with a profound understanding of oral health as part of general health - and the oral clinical specialist - whose role is the provision of advanced oral rehabilitation, able also to treat people with complex chronic diseases and multiple medications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available