4.3 Review

A possible biomechanical role of occlusal cusp-fossa contact relationships

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 69-79

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02333.x

Keywords

occlusion; biomechanics; masticatory system; biting; chewing movement

Funding

  1. Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [30772429, 30872870]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biomechanical features of occlusal contacts are important in understanding the role of the occlusion contributing to masticatory function. Cuspfossa contact is the typical pattern of occlusion between upper and lower teeth. This includes static relations, such as that during clenching, and dynamic relations when mandibular teeth contact in function along the maxillary occlusal pathways, as during mastication. During clenching in the maximum intercuspal position (ICP), cuspal inclines may take the role of distributing the occlusal forces in multi-directions thus preventing excessive point pressures on the individual tooth involved. During chewing movement on the functional side, the mandible moves slightly from buccal through the maximum ICP to the contralateral side. The part of the chewing cycle where occlusal contacts occur and the pathways taken by the mandible with teeth in occlusal contacts are determined by the morphology of the teeth. The degree of contact is associated with the activity of the jaw muscles. To obtain repeatable static and dynamic occlusal contact information provided by the morphology of the teeth, maximum voluntary clenching and chewing movements with maximum range are needed. In conclusion, in addition to the standard occlusal concepts of centric relation/centric occlusion and group function/cuspid protection relation, biomechanics in static and dynamic cuspfossa relationships should be included to develop an understanding of occlusal harmony which includes no interfering or deflective contacts in functional occlusal contact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available