4.4 Article

miR-181 as a putative biomarker for lymph-node metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 397-404

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2010.01003.x

Keywords

metastasis; migration; miR-181; oral squamous carcinoma

Funding

  1. National Science Council [NSC-96-2628-B-010-033-MY3]
  2. Department of Education, Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is an important malignant disease around the world. Aberrant expression of MicroRNAs (miRNAs) has been implicated in carcinogenesis of various cancers. In previous studies, up-regulation of miR-181 was observed when OSCC progressed from leukoplakia, dysplasia to invasive carcinoma. However, the function of miR-181 in oral tumorigenesis remains unclear. Materials and methods: The expression levels of miR-181 in the tissue and plasma of OSCC patients were measured by quantitative RT-PCR. The correlation between miR-181 level and multiple clinical variables were then checked by Mann-Whitney test and Wilcoxon matched pairs test. To study the functional meaning of up-regulated miR-181, migration assay and invasion assay by transwells and colony forming assay were applied to analyze the tumorigenic phenotypes of OSCC cells with ectopical expression of miR-181. Results: Among different clinical variables, over-expression of miR-181 was correlated with lymph-node metastasis, vascular invasion, and a poor survival. Functional assays revealed ectopically over-expressed miR-181 would enhance cell migration and invasion, but not the ability of anchorage-independent growth of OSCC cells. In addition, the up-regulation of miR-181 could be detected both in tumor tissues and plasma. Conclusion: miR-181 may enhance lymph-node metastasis through regulating migration, which could potentially be exploited as a putative biomarker for patients with OSCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available