4.4 Article

Influence of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms in oral cancer patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 61-66

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2010.00943.x

Keywords

MTHFR polymorphisms; MTHFR C677T; MTHFR A1298C; oral cancer; prognosis; susceptibility

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [SP/SO/B-64/2001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is a key enzyme in folate metabolism. Two common polymorphisms associated with MTHFR gene - C677T and A1298C - influence the thermolabile nature and activity of the enzyme. This study aimed to investigate the role of MTHFR polymorphisms on oral cancer susceptibility and its potential impact on the prognostic outcome. Methods: Oral cancer cases and controls were genotyped using PCR-RFLP technique for MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms. Disease susceptibility analysed using regression analysis. The association between clinical outcomes and the polymorphisms were analysed using univariate and multivariate model. Results: The 677CT+TT genotype showed a significant three-fold reduction in oral cancer risk (RR-0.35, p-0.009). 1298CC genotype showed decreased cancer risk when compared to AA+AC genotype (RR-0.55, p-0.062). When prognostic significance of MTHFR polymorphism was evaluated, 677CT+TT patients showed improved survival than the CC individuals (RR = 0.56, P = 0.378). The 1298 CC and AC+CC showed an increased risk for treatment failure and poor survival when compared with the wild AA genotype (HR = 4.27, P = 0.001). Conclusion: Here we observed MTHFR C677T to influence oral cancer susceptibility, while A1298C polymorphism associated with patient prognosis. Our data support MTHFR polymorphism to be an independent prognostic marker in oral carcinoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available