Evaluation of Minimal Versus Conventional Presurgical Orthodontics in Skeletal Class III Patients Treated With Two-Jaw Surgery

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare changes in hard and soft tissues and the treatment efficacy of 2-jaw surgery combined with nonextraction treatment for skeletal Class III malocclusion in patients who received minimal presurgical orthodontics (MPO) versus those who received conventional presurgical orthodontics (CPO). Materials and Methods: Thirty-two patients (16 in each group) with skeletal Class III malocclusion who underwent 2-jaw surgery were included in the study. Serial lateral cephalometric films were traced at 4 stages: before treatment (T0), before surgery (T1), 1 month after surgery (T2), and at debonding (T3). Cephalometric measurements and treatment duration were compared using independent t test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: After the presurgical treatment phase, the angle between the lower incisor axis and mandibular plane, overjet, and soft tissue pogonion to the vertical reference line showed larger changes (P < 0.01) in the CPO group, whereas the pogonion to the horizontal reference line showed larger changes (P < .05) in the MPO group. In the postsurgical phase (T2 to T3), there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. Total treatment duration was significantly shorter in the MPO group. Conclusions: There were no significant differences between the MPO and CPO groups in the hard and soft tissue cephalometric variables. The MPO group had a shorter total treatment time. It is therefore recommended that clinicians consider these results when selecting MPO as a treatment option for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning of Class III surgical patients. (C) 2013 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons