4.1 Article

Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 Combined With an Osteoconductive Bulking Agent for Mandibular Continuity Defects in Nonhuman Primates

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 70, Issue 3, Pages 703-716

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.088

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medtronic Sofamor Danek (Memphis, TN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) is an option for reconstructing mandibular continuity defects. A challenge of this technique is the need to maintain sufficient space to avoid compression of the defect. A compression-resistant matrix (CRM) provides a bulking agent that provides support during the bone formation phase. Materials and Methods: Thirteen Rhesus Macaque monkeys were used to evaluate different forms of an osteoconductive bulking agent compared with an absorbable collagen alone placed into a critical-sized mandibular defect. A total of 5 groups (26 defects) were evaluated: group A, rhBMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) (1.5 mg/mL); group B, rhBMP-2/ACS with ceramic granules (15% hydroxyapatite/85% beta-tricalcium phosphate) at 1.5 mg/mL; group C, rhBMP-2 (2.0 mg/mL) with a CRM; group D, rhBMP-2 (0.75 mg/mL) with a CRM; and group E, a CRM alone. Results: Histology and micro computed tomography were used to evaluate and compare new bone formation in the defects. The reconstructed bone was evaluated with regard to the new bone formation, residual voids, and density. Animals treated with the CRM and rhBMP-2 at 2.0 mg/mL (group C) showed significantly higher amounts of new bone formation, bone density, and reduced voids when compared with rhBMP-2 and ACS (1.5 mg/mL) (P < .05). Conclusion: The carrier system CRM combined with rhBMP-2 and a reconstruction plate results in significantly higher bone density and better space maintenance than rhBMP-2 combined with ACS in a nonhuman primate mandibular bone repair model. (c) 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:703-716, 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available