4.1 Article

Prognostic Significance of p27Kip1, Ki-67, and CRTC1-MAML2 Fusion Transcript in Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: A Molecular and Clinicopathologic Study of 101 Cases

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 67, Issue 7, Pages 1432-1441

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.021

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most frequently detected primary malignancy of the salivary gland and is characterized by a marked variation in prognosis. In the present study, we investigated the prognostic significance of p27(Kip1), Ki-67, and CRTC1 (also called MECT1, TORC1, and WAMTP1)-MAML2 fusion in MEC. Materials and Methods: MEC cases (n = 101) were examined for p27(Kip1) and Ki-67 expression using immunohistochemistry and for CRTC1-MAML2 fusion transcript using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Results: p27(Kip1), Ki-67, and the CRTC1-MAML2 fusion transcript were expressed in 71, 31, and 34 of the 101 cases, respectively. p27(Kip1) and CRTC1-MAML2 fusion were associated with favorable clinicopathologic tumor features and Ki-67 with aggressive clinicopathologic features. Multivariate Survival analyses were performed that included the following 10 clinicopathologic factors: age, gender, tumor site, tumor size, nodal metastasis, clinical stage, histologic grade, p27 expression, Ki-67 expression, and CRTC1-MAML2 fusion. For disease-free Survival, only p27(Kip1) expression was significant as an independent prognostic factor. For overall survival, p27(Kip1) expression, CRTC1-MAML2 fusion, and tumor size were significant. In each analysis, p27(Kip1) and CRTC1-MAML2 fusion were independent of the clinical stage. Ki-67 expression was not selected in either multivariate analysis. Conclusions: p27(Kip1) and CRTC1-MAML2 fusion were associated with favorable clinicopathologic tumor features, and both were useful in predicting the overall Survival of patients with MEC. For disease-free survival, p27(Kip1) might be the most useful prognostic factor. In contrast, Ki-67 might not be a very powerful prognostic indicator for either Survival point. (C) 2009 American Association of Ored and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:1432-1441, 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available