4.6 Article

On the appropriate objective function for post-disaster humanitarian logistics models

Journal

JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 262-280

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2013.06.002

Keywords

Humanitarian logistics; Deprivation cost; Human suffering; Optimization

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-0624083, NSF-CMS-SGER 0554949, NSF-IIS 1124827]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF-RAPID)
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1123924] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper argues that welfare economic principles must be incorporated in post-disaster humanitarian logistic models to ensure delivery strategies that lead to the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The paper's analyses suggest the use of social costs the summation of logistic and deprivation costs as the preferred objective function for post-disaster humanitarian logistic models. The paper defines deprivation cost as the economic valuation of the human suffering associated with a lack of access to a good or service. The use of deprivation costs is evaluated with a review of the philosophy and the economic literature to identify proper foundations for their estimation; a comparison of different proxy approaches to consider human suffering (e.g., minimization of penalties or weight factors, penalties for late deliveries, equity constraints, unmet demands) and their implications; and an analysis of the impacts of errors in estimation. In its final sections, the paper conducts numerical experiments to illustrate the comparative impacts of using the proxy approaches suggested in the literature, and concludes with a discussion of key findings. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available