4.3 Article

Comparison of Agitake (Pleurotus eryngii var. ferulae) Volatile Components with Characteristic Odors Extracted by Hydrodistillation and Solvent-assisted Flavor Evaporation

Journal

JOURNAL OF OLEO SCIENCE
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages 83-92

Publisher

JAPAN OIL CHEMISTS SOC
DOI: 10.5650/jos.ess13043

Keywords

Agitake (Pleurotus eryngii var. ferulae); volatile oil; hydrodistillation (HD); solvent-assisted flavor evaporation (SAFE); aroma extraction dilution analysis (AEDA)

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [24658055]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24658055] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical composition of volatile oil from agitake (Pleurotus eryngii var. ferulae) was established for the first time using gas chromatography (GC) and GC-mass spectrometry. Sixty-seven and 24 components were extracted by hydrodistillation (HD) using diethyl ether (DE) and dichloromethane (DM), respectively; these components accounted for 80.3% and 91.8% of the total oil, respectively. Thirteen and 48 components of were extracted by the solvent-assisted flavor evaporation method (SAFE), using DE and DM, respectively, and identified; these components accounted for 83.5% and 82.0% of the total oil, respectively. Methylsuccinimide and 2,3,7-trimethyl-2-octene were the most characteristic components by SAFE using DM. Odor evaluation of the volatile oil from agitake was also carried out using GC-olfactometry (GC-O), aroma extraction dilution analysis (AEDA), and the odor activity value (OAV). Sixteen, 8, 5 and 9 aroma-active components were identified using HD (DE and DM) and SAFE (DE and DM), respectively. The main aroma-active components extracted using HD and SAFE were 1-octen-3-ol (mushroom-like) and phenylacetaldehyde (floral), respectively. This study proved that HD and SAFE can be used as complementary extraction techniques for the complete characterization of volatile oil from agitake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available