4.6 Article

Geometries, stabilities and fragmental channels of neutral and charged sulfur clusters: SnQ (n=3-20, Q=0, ±1)

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 17, Issue 20, Pages 13590-13597

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cp00728c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11274235, 11304167]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [20110491317, 2014T70280]
  3. Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province [15HASTIT020]
  4. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Superhard Materials [201405]
  5. Young Core Instructor Foundation of Henan Province [2012GGJS-152]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have performed unbiased searches for the global minimum structures of neutral and charged sulfur clusters S-n(Q) (n = 3-20, Q = 0, +/- 1) relying on the CALYPSO structure searching method combined with density functional theory geometric optimization. Very accurate ab initio calculations are used to determine relative stabilities and energy ranking among competing low-lying isomers of the neutral and charged sulfur clusters obtained from the structure search. The harmonic vibrational analysis is also undertaken to assure that the optimized geometries are the true minima. It is shown that the most equilibrium geometries of sulfur clusters are closed three-dimensional (3D) helical rings, which is in agreement with the experimental observations. The binding energies, second-order energy differences, and highest occupied-lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) gaps of the considered species are calculated and analyzed systematically. Additionally, the fragmentation channels are determined and the results indicate that the S-n(Q) -> S-2 + S-n-2(Q) channel is a route that the small clusters (n = 3-10) favor, while the larger species (n = 13-20) prefer the S-n(Q) -> S-8 + S-n-8(Q) channel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available