4.6 Article

The electronic structure and charge transfer excited states of the endohedral trimetallic nitride C80 (Ih) fullerenes-Zn-tetraphenyl porphyrin dyads

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages 5832-5839

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4cp04583a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE Basic Energy Science [DE-SC0006818, DE-SC0002168]
  2. NSF [DMR-1205302]
  3. UTEP COURI program
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) [TG-DMR090071]
  5. NERSC
  6. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0002168] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  7. Division Of Materials Research
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1205302] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Endohedral fullerenes offer the possibility of tuning their properties through a choice of the endohedral unit. The Sc3N@C-80 fullerene is the most abundant fullerene after C-60 and C-70. Recently, Sc3N@C-80 has been tested for light harvesting properties with encouraging results. In this work, we study the electronic structure of three endohedral fullerene-Zn tetraphenyl porphyrin complexes using density functional theory. The binding between the components in these complexes arises due to van der Waals interaction. A fragment orbital analysis is carried out to examine the interaction between the two components which shows that a small charge transfer occurs in the ground state from the ZnTPP to the fullerenes and that the orientation of the Sc3N plane affects the ground state charge transfer. The charge transfer excited state energies are calculated using our perturbative delta-SCF method. A comparison with earlier calculations shows that the charge transfer excitation energy increases as C-60-ZnTPP < C-70-ZnTPP < Sc3N@C-80-ZnTPP < Y3N@C-80-ZnTPP. The orientation of the endohedral unit does not influence the excitation energy in the donor-acceptor complexes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available